REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization (WHO). Global oral health status report: Towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030. https://www.who.int/team/noncommunicable-diseases/global-status-report-on-oral-health-2022. Published 18 November 2022
2. Heidelberg University Hospital. Oral diseases cost the world $710 billion annually. Newsroom. https://www.klinikum.uni-heidelberg.de/newsroom/en/oral-diseases-cost-the-world-710-billion-annually/. Published November 14, 2024.
3. European Federation of Periodontology (EFP). White paper: Oral health in comprehensive health – The EFP’s manifesto. EFP. https://www.efp.org/fileadmin/uploads/efp/Documents/Other_publications/EIxEFP_-_Oral_Health_white_paper_FINAL.pdf.”
4. British Dental Association (BDA). A billion in cuts. BDA News and Opinion. https://www.bda.org/news-and-opinion/news/a-billion-in-cuts/. Published January 25, 2024.
5. Bjørndal L, Simon S, Tomson PL, Duncan HF. Management of deep caries and the exposed pulp. Int Endod J. 2019 Jul;52(7):949-973. doi: 10.1111/iej.13128. Epub 2019 May 13.
6. American Association of Endodontists (AAE). (n.d.). Press kit. https://newsroom.aae.org/press-kit/.
7. Schwendicke F, Stolpe M, Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S, Dörfer CE. Cost-effectiveness of one- and two-step incomplete and complete excavations. J Dent Res. 2013 Oct;92(10):880-7. doi: 10.1177/0022034513500792. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23945975/
8. Schwendicke F, Stolpe M. Direct pulp capping after a carious exposure versus root canal treatment: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Endod. 2014 Nov;40(11):1764-70. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.07.028. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25218524/
9. Naved N, Umer F, Khowaja AR. Irreversible pulpitis in mature permanent teeth: a cost-effectiveness analysis of pulpotomy versus root canal treatment. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 28;24(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04052-9.
10. Kaul S, Kumar A, Jasrotia A, Gorkha K, Kumari S, Jeri SY. Comparative Analysis of Biodentine, Calcium Hydroxide, and 2% Chlorhexidine with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement as Indirect Pulp Capping Materials in Young Permanent Molars. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 May 1;22(5):511-516. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34318769/
11. Parinyaprom N, Nirunsittirat A, Chuveera P, Na Lampang S, Srisuwan T, Sastraruji T, Bua-On P, Simprasert S, Khoipanich I, Sutharaphan T, Theppimarn S, Ue-Srichai N, Tangtrakooljaroen W, Chompu-Inwai P. Outcomes of Direct Pulp Capping by Using Either ProRoot Mineral Trioxide Aggregate or Biodentine in Permanent Teeth with Carious Pulp Exposure in 6- to 18-Year-Old Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Endod. 2018 Mar;44(3):341-348. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.10.012. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29275850/
12. Guang J, Li J, Hao L. Clinical observation and histopathological evaluation of pulp after pulpotomy of primary teeth with formocresol and biodentine. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2022 May 31;68(5):83-88. doi: 10.14715/cmb/2022.68.5.11. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36029512/
13. European Society of Endodontology (ESE) developed by:; Duncan HF, Galler KM, Tomson PL, Simon S, El-Karim I, Kundzina R, Krastl G, Dammaschke T, Fransson H, Markvart M, Zehnder M, Bjørndal L. European Society of Endodontology position statement: Management of deep caries and the exposed pulp. Int Endod J. 2019 Jul;52(7):923-934. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1111%2Fiej.13080
14. About I, ed. Biodentine™ Properties and Clinical Applications. Springer. 2022.
15. Watson TF, Atmeh AR, Sajini S, Cook RJ, Festy F. Present and future of glass-ionomers and calcium-silicate cements as bioactive materials in dentistry: biophotonics-based interfacial analyses in health and disease. Dent Mater. 2014 Jan;30(1):50-61. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.08.202. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0109564113004004
16. Kuru E, Eronat N, Türkün M, Çoğulu D. Comparison of remineralization ability of tricalcium silicate and of glass ionomer cement on residual dentin: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jun 26;24(1):732. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04475-4. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38926776/
17. Internal data: Biodentine™ Scientific File, 2011 – specific pages.
18. Rajasekharan S, Martens LC, Cauwels RGEC, Anthonappa RP. Biodentine™ material characteristics and clinical applications: a 3 year literature review and update. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Feb;19(1):1-22. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0328-x. Avaimable at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29372451/
19. Selvendran KE, Ahamed AS, Krishnamurthy M, Kumar VN, Raju VG. Comparison of three different materials used for indirect pulp capping in permanent molars: An in vivo study. J Conserv Dent. 2022 Jan-Feb;25(1):68-71. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_551_21. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9200191/
20. Boddeda KR, Rani CR, V Vanga NR, Chandrabhatla SK. Comparative evaluation of biodentine, 2% chlorhexidine with RMGIC and calcium hydroxide as indirect pulp capping materials in primary molars: An in vivo study. Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2019 Jan-Mar;37(1):60-66. DOI: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_213_17. Available at: https://europepmc.org/article/med/30804309
21. Chauhan A, Dua P, Saini S, Mangla R, Butail A, Ahluwalia S. In vivo Outcomes of Indirect Pulp Treatment in Primary Posterior Teeth: 6 Months’ Follow-up. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Jun;9(Suppl 1):S69-S73. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_48_18. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6006903/
22. Hashem D, Mannocci F, Patel S, Manoharan A, Brown JE, Watson TF, Banerjee A. Clinical and radiographic assessment of the efficacy of calcium silicate indirect pulp capping: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res. 2015 Apr;94(4):562-8. doi: 10.1177/0022034515571415. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4485218/#section10-0022034515571415
23. Shara Sajini, Amre R. Atmeh, Avijit Banerjee, Frederic Festy, Richard J. Cook, Manoharan Andiappan, Timothy F. Watson. ‘Glass-ionomer and calcium silicate-based cements interactions with human dentine in health and disease: Two-photon fluorescence microscopy and Raman spectroscopy analysis’. Dental Materials. 2022, 38(11): 1710-1720. ISSN 0109-5641. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2022.09.001
24. Niranjan B, Shashikiran ND, Singla S et al. A comparative microleakage evaluation of three different base materials in Class I cavity in deciduous molars in sandwich technique using dye penetration and dentin surface interface by scanning electron microscope. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2016; 34(4): 324-30. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27681395/
25. Kaur M, Singh H, Dhillon JS, Batra M, Saini M. MTA versus Biodentine: Review of Literature with a Comparative Analysis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Aug;11(8):ZG01-ZG05. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25840.10374. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5620936/
26. Koubi G, Colon P, Franquin JC, Hartmann A, Richard G, Faure MO, Lambert G. Clinical evaluation of the performance and safety of a new dentine substitute, Biodentine, in the restoration of posterior teeth – a prospective study. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Jan;17(1):243-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0701-9. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3536989/
Sign up now and get an exclusive access to: